CO129-080 - Sir Robinson - 1861 [1-3] — Page 69

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

M: Vype's warrant was issued on a certain day in January 1860, intended to state that the crime of Mr Mom was committed in the previous November; the wound in date might or might not have been fatal.

The order of 23th January 1860 gives M. Alcock power to inflict fine or imprisonment, whereas Mr Alcock added imprisonment to fine. This also was not argued. It will be seen that amidst this series of imputed errors, the one on which the Sentence was actually quashed was the really executable, for neither Mr May nor the Magistracy Clerk could know of an order in Council which had never been promulgated by the Government and the Government could not...

Edit History

2026-05-18 21:39:41 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
M: Vype's warrant was issued on a certain day in January 1860, intended to state that the crime of Mr Mom was committed in the previous November; the wound in date might or might not have been fatal. The order of 23th January 1860 gives M. Alcock power to inflict fine or imprisonment, whereas Mr Alcock added imprisonment to fine. This also was not argued. It will be seen that amidst this series of imputed errors, the one on which the Sentence was actually quashed was the really executable, for neither Mr May nor the Magistracy Clerk could know of an order in Council which had never been promulgated by the Government and the Government could not...
Baseline (Original)
1. M: Vype's warrant was Fates on certain day in Janny 1860, intend January and set F 1861- out that the crime of Mr Mom was committed in the previous November; the evive in date might or might not have been fatal.. 2. The order 7 23th Janmay 1860 gives M. Alcock power to inflict fine or imprisonment, whereas Mr Alcock added imprisonment to fine- 37 This alss was not argued. He will be seen that amidst this series of imputed erns that бу the Magistrate here, on which the Sentence was actually quacked, one was the really exercable, fom neither Mr May un the Magistincy Clerk could Know of an order im Council which had never been promulgated by the Government and the Government could not 7
2026-05-18 21:39:41 · Baseline
View content

1.

M: Vype's warrant was

Fates on

certain day in

Janny 1860, intend January

and set

F

1861-

out that the crime

of Mr Mom was committed in the previous November; the evive in date might or might not have been fatal..

2.

The order

7

23th Janmay

1860 gives M. Alcock

power to inflict fine or imprisonment, whereas Mr Alcock added

imprisonment to fine-

37

This alss was not argued.

He will be seen that

amidst this series of

imputed

erns

that

бу

the Magistrate here, on

which the Sentence was

actually quacked,

one

was

the

really exercable, fom neither Mr May

un

the

Magistincy Clerk could

Know of

an order im

Council which had never

been promulgated by the Government and the Government could not

7

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.